The Case for Health Care Freedom by Representative Tim Jones

In less than a month, Missouri will be the first state in our nation to vote on a referendum on the federal health care law that was passed earlier this year.  A measure, known as the “Health Care Freedom Act,” passed the Missouri legislature earlier this year and has been put on the August ballot in Missouri.  If approved by voters, the Missouri Health Care Freedom Act would create statutory protections against government mandated insurance and ensure that Missourians continue to possess the ability to make their own health care decisions.  In light of the new federal health care laws and all of the weekly bad news that continues to be “discovered” about ObamaCare, Missouri needs these protections.

It is clear that Missourians not only oppose the new federal health care law, but also the individual insurance mandate in the new law that would force individuals to purchase health insurance, or face fines and penalties.  Equally troubling for Missourians are the nearly weekly updates from the Congressional Budget Office that show that, instead of reducing the federal deficits, ObamaCare will cost an additional 800 billion dollars over the next ten years.  Because of these concerns, a Rasmussen poll released this week showed that a clear majority of Missourians still want the new federal bill repealed.  Even though this opposition was made clear in town halls and tea parties, Congress passed the bill against the objections of Americans.

In an effort to protect Missourians from this dangerous encroachment on our freedoms, a bipartisan super majority of state legislators supported the Health Care Freedom Act during the 2010 legislative session.  The Act contains two major provisions: protections for Missourians from being forced to purchase health insurance and a prohibition against government fines and penalties for refusing to purchase insurance.  This legislation was crafted because Missourians are far more capable of making their own health care decisions than Washington politicians and bureaucrats.

The authority of the federal government to pass legislation that requires the purchase of a private product is highly questionable.  While the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution has been used to justify federal regulation of private enterprise, never before in our nation’s history has “inactivity” been regulated.  That is, while the active participation in commerce and private enterprise has been regulated by the federal government for years, individuals have never been forced to participate “in” commerce, as the federal health care law would require.  This expanded power creates a dangerous precedent for government overreach, and has the potential to dramatically expand the size and scope of government.

Should Missourians pass the Health Care Freedom Act, we would retain the power and freedom to determine our own health care and send a message to the federal government that we have had it with their overreaching and their mandates.  If you, like me, have had it with an out of control, out of touch federal government, I encourage you to vote ‘yes’ on Proposition C on August 3.

Representative Tim Jones represents Missouris’ 89th District in the Missouri House of Representatives, which includes parts of St. Louis County.  You can learn more about Representative Jones by visiting his website at http://www.timwjones.com/.

2 Responses to “The Case for Health Care Freedom by Representative Tim Jones”

  • Sally:

    Will we be seeing commercials to get the word out about the Health Care Freedom Act? I’ve spoken to several people and they said they’ve never heard anything about it.

    It is also very disturbing that in the United States of America we have to VOTE on something called Health Care FREEDOM.

  • Rob:

    Sally, radio ads are on the way. By your speaking with several people, you informed them. Keep up the same!

Leave a Reply

Find us on Facebook!
Subscribe
Find us on Facebook! spacer Follow us on Twitter!